Today I would like to talk on more about the misuse of cyber space since we still dealing with people through a platform.
The issue that I would like to talk on is about Auni Ameera. Yes, for me she is the part of hot topic on cyber crime issue. But, who is she anyways?What she's up to all about? You think that this cyberspace can be written all over the place regardless the sensitivity of others? No, you are definitely wrong.
The link to her profile in Facebook as follows: https://www.facebook.com/Auni.Ameera
And, many of her issues sometimes are very related to the sensitivity of the religion and other state, such as Kelantan.
Sometimes, her posts might be ending up as true thing, but somehow it leads to the hatred of some people.
Let me deal with her previous issue posting.
So, what Auni actually had written as follows:
"Kelantan ketagih dadah.
I've told you, dulu cakap tak nak dengar, siap maki balik.. Kelantan adalah Serambi Maksiat, Gelar Kelantan sebagai 'Serambil Mekah' adalah penghinaan kepada Mecca.. 10~15 akan datang kelantan mungkin akan jadi seperti India, Penuh perogol dan gang raping, tak selamat untuk perempuan dan ramai yang akan keluar dari kelantan sebab negeri tu di pimpin orang yang tak boleh perform sebagai pemimpin.
Kelantan negeri sempadan bersepah syarikat besar nak invest dalam negeri tu sebagai contoh, Aeon dan Jusco n etc juga pembangunan jenis lain.. Tapi dulu so called ulama tak kasi sebab takut maksiat.
Bila syarikat besar invest ini bermaksud lebih banyak perluang pekerjaan yang akan ada, penduduk setempat boleh dapat pekerjaan dan income untuk support hidup dia orang, tapi bila perluang pekerjaan terhad, ramai rakyat yang merempat, bila merempat ramai yang buat benda yang elok dan terjebak dengan jenayah.. Ramai menggangur dan ramai yang tak ada pendidikan nanti sebab parent takde duit nak kasi pendidikan pada anak.
Tapi cakap dengan 'ulama' kelantan ni apa mereka tau? Yang mereka tahu kahwin 4 kuat berjimak then lepas tu bising pasal aurat n hudud.. Dan umno pun sama bangang, Sabah dan Sarawak di anak tirikan cuma tempat laundering duit dan dapatkan undi. "
This is part of her writings.
First, as for me, it is part of the cyber abused. She is using the improper words and generalize the whole state, that this state is a drug addict state based on the news that she have gotten. The information that shes taking for is to condemned most people likely without a correct source. The damage may be part of the humiliation, the argument that happens between liberals and religious. Her reaction on the post is far from consistent when she is trying to relate between the drug addict and the ulama' of Kelantan. If you compare the statistic that she is trying to relate with rapes and drug addict, why she is using the word 'maksiat' instead of 'jenayah' for drug addicts matter. Remember, the news are telling on the part of drug addicts. it is not the same between 'maksiat' and 'jenayah' since, 'maksiat' can fall into the category of 'jenayah syariah' while 'jenayah' can fall into the category of the public authority, where everyone agrees that is a crime. For example, kissing in public, at the Western, it is known as part of their culture, but when comes to the religious context, it is actually a crime for unmarried couple. If you see from Rape Statistics Malaysia, Kelantan is not in the highest ranking from 2006 until 2015. Why that relates with the crime of drug addict? How actually it reflects the religious authority on this matter? Is this the reason of religious authority, or the public authority, as Auni known for her liberalism?Is her information is really sound and factual? For me, she is talking according to her emotion and feelings, to bash certain things? Instead of solving this matter, I have found out she is more likely intending to bash people rather than giving solution. Too many drug addicts? What solution she can really give? As for me, even we are living in a democratic country, but we actually can give our opinion in regards to take care of other feelings and not generalizing the thing. Not all Kelantanese are bad, and I am not Kelantanese. If she is talking about the matter on marrying 4 people, it is under few condition(s) that the married man must do, and ultimately he must be FAIR among his wives. Does Kelantan really not giving the education to their people? If you see on Malaysia law on Akta Pendidikan (Pindaan) 2002, under Section of 29(A), it is stated that, "Seksyen 29A(2) memperuntukkan setiap ibu bapa warganegara Malaysia yang tinggal di negara ini memastikan anak mereka yang mencapai umur enam tahun pada hari pertama bulan Januari didaftarkan sebagai murid sekolah rendah." And, it seems that everyone receive their education - know how to write, read and calculate as the basics for them to pursue not necessarily on the higher education, but through learning from experiences. Perhaps, its because of the economy recession, in which the job is hardly to get, that lead to stressful life. Is that because of the religion? Or, due to the leaders?
Now, I will pursue on CMA Law of Malaysia in which she can be accused. This activist have actually taken several things that she might be fall under accused person:
1. Under Chapter 2 of CMA 1998 Malaysia Law, Section 211(1), it is strictly prohibit that the content provider or other person using the platform to provide content that is misleading, improper and offensive as she accused and generalized the state of Kelantan as drug addict state. She might be sued under Section 211(2) where she might pay for RM 50K or imprisonment not exceeding one year or both.
2. Under Section 216, the content provider must be taken steps for the minimal damage caused like to block her account once her account is being reported.
3. Under Chapter 2 Section 241, she might be sued for giving misleading statement as some of her statement might mislead others, such that "Tapi cakap dengan 'ulama' kelantan ni apa mereka tau? Yang mereka tahu kahwin 4 kuat berjimak then lepas tu bising pasal aurat n hudud.. Dan umno pun sama bangang, Sabah dan Sarawak di anak tirikan cuma tempat laundering duit dan dapatkan undi.", which this statement from her might misleading others who does not know our religious rule, and thus, might cause the argument between the ignorance and other islamic marhaen of this country. As to my understanding, statement is an opinion that being voiced out of others that lead to change or brainwashing of others thinking which can be not conclusive, or concluded with the supported facts.
4. I do understand she did this with her intention, as I, myself, from my account facebook has been blocked due to giving the comments that is not supporting her statement. She knew what might cause, and some already caused due to her posting(s) in Facebook, that lead to others anger and search for her. That is why she is anonymous.
5. Under Section 233, she is actually using the improper use of the network facilities to make suggestion that is offensive in intent of the annoy or harass another person that regards either to disclosure or non disclosure of the identity.
6. She might be fall under the section of.. I dont know which section, but in regards, she is using the information or knowledge to giving offence of others, in this case using the news to bash Kelantan which her statement actually inconsistent.
7. If she is right, the issue not to state what is happening as the part of proof, but rather as providing the solution and using media social to promote the goodness instead of causing the argument of others.
By the way, the link to the news as follows: https://www.hanasuva.com/kota-bharu-bandar-paling-ramai-penagih-dadah/
.
